Files
palladium/studies/202512_GenesysCX/README.md
Robert Helewka 64fb83257d feat: add GenesysCX study and fix Streamlit chart key collisions
- Add 202512_GenesysCX TEI study (config, seed data, notebooks, README)
  with NPV $10.8M / ROI 266% including AI-token cost line
- Add explicit `key` parameter to all chart wrappers in app/components
  to prevent StreamlitDuplicateElementId errors when the same figure
  type renders across Summary/Benefits/Costs tabs
- Render benefits bar and cost pie charts on their respective tabs
- Add benefits_vs_costs_by_year chart wrapper
2026-06-10 14:26:49 -04:00

52 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Genesys CX Cloud TEI — December 2025
Source: Forrester, *The Total Economic Impact™ Of CX Cloud — Cost Savings And
Business Benefits Enabled By Genesys And Salesforce* (commissioned by Genesys
and Salesforce, December 2025). PDF in `docs/`.
## Headline (published, 3-yr risk-adjusted PV @ 10%)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Benefits PV | $14,840,638 |
| Costs PV | $4,057,170 |
| **NPV** | **$10,783,468** |
| **ROI** | **266%** |
| Payback | ~4 months (computed; not headlined in the study) |
Composite: global supply company, $2.5B revenue, 10,000 employees, 600 CX
agents (400 concurrent licenses), 80,000 weekly interactions @ 12 min.
## Structure
4 benefits (legacy retirement ↓5%, self-service savings ↓15%, agent
efficiency ↓10%, agent-assist sales ↓5%) and 3 published costs (licenses ↑5%,
implementation ↑10% — initial-only, ongoing management ↑10%), **plus one
Palladium addition**: `genesys_ai_tokens`, an AI Experience token consumption
line the published study omits (it models $0 AI cost while three of four
benefits depend on AI). Stored exactly as Athena stores it — a single annual
cost value, entered from the Genesys quote in `01_business_case.ipynb` (which
includes a sensitivity sweep), with quote details kept in the field notes.
Seeded at $0 to reproduce the published totals.
## Study quirks (documented, handled)
- p.14 prints implementation initial as $1,304,600; correct figure is
$1,309,000 (= 1,190,000 × 1.10) per the detail table and cash-flow analysis.
- B7's printed formula cites B2 (15%) where the 12-minute interaction length
is meant; the result (40 FTEs) is correct.
- The initial cost is ~32% of cost PV, so Athena's discount-initial-as-Year-1
behaviour shifts ROI to ~277%. Verification matches `ATHENA_EXPECTED`
tightly, then reconciles to `PUBLISHED` with this explained delta.
## Notebooks
| Notebook | Purpose |
|---|---|
| `00_provision.ipynb` | Create template + fields + tool in Athena (client/proposal selection), seed, calculate, verify |
| `01_business_case.ipynb` | Working business case + Genesys AI token quantity × price sensitivity |
Env keys are study-scoped: `PALLADIUM_GENESYSCX_REPORT_PUBLIC_ID`,
`PALLADIUM_GENESYSCX_TOOL_PUBLIC_ID`, `PALLADIUM_GENESYSCX_PROPOSAL_ID` /
`PALLADIUM_GENESYSCX_ENGAGEMENT_ID`.