- Introduced a new vision analysis service to classify, describe, and extract text from images. - Enhanced the Image model with fields for OCR text, vision model name, and analysis status. - Added a new "nonfiction" library type with specific chunking and embedding configurations. - Updated content types to include vision prompts for various library types. - Integrated vision analysis into the embedding pipeline, allowing for image analysis during document processing. - Implemented metrics to track vision analysis performance and usage. - Updated UI components to display vision analysis results and statuses in item details and the embedding dashboard. - Added migration for new vision model fields and usage tracking.
9.7 KiB
Phase 2B: Vision Analysis Pipeline
Objective
Add vision-based image understanding to the embedding pipeline: when documents are processed and images extracted, use a vision-capable LLM to classify, describe, extract text from, and identify concepts within each image — connecting images into the knowledge graph as first-class participants alongside text.
Heritage
Extends Phase 2's image extraction (PyMuPDF) and multimodal embedding (Qwen3-VL) with structured understanding. Previously, images were stored and optionally embedded into vector space, but had no description, no classification beyond a hardcoded default, and no concept graph integration. Phase 2B makes images understood.
Architecture Overview
Image Extracted (Phase 2)
→ Stored in S3 + Image node in Neo4j
→ Vision Analysis (NEW - Phase 2B)
→ Classify image type (diagram, photo, chart, etc.)
→ Generate natural language description
→ Extract visible text (OCR)
→ Identify concepts depicted
→ Create DEPICTS relationships to Concept nodes
→ Connect Item to image-derived concepts via REFERENCES
→ Multimodal Embedding (Phase 2, now enhanced)
How It Fits the Graph
Vision analysis enriches images so they participate in the knowledge graph the same way text chunks do:
Item ─[HAS_IMAGE]──→ Image
│
├── description: "Wiring diagram showing 3-phase motor connection"
├── image_type: "diagram" (auto-classified)
├── ocr_text: "L1 L2 L3 ..."
├── vision_model_name: "Qwen3-VL-72B"
│
├──[DEPICTS]──→ Concept("3-phase motor")
├──[DEPICTS]──→ Concept("wiring diagram")
└──[DEPICTS]──→ Concept("electrical connection")
│
└──[RELATED_TO]──→ Concept("motor control")
↑
Chunk text also ──[MENTIONS]──┘
Three relationship types connect content to concepts:
Chunk ─[MENTIONS]─→ Concept— text discusses this conceptItem ─[REFERENCES]─→ Concept— item is about this conceptImage ─[DEPICTS]─→ Concept— image visually shows this concept
Concepts extracted from images merge with the same Concept nodes extracted from text via deduplication by name. This means graph traversal discovers cross-modal connections automatically.
Deliverables
1. System Vision Model (llm_manager/models.py)
New is_system_vision_model boolean field on LLMModel, following the same pattern as the existing system embedding, chat, and reranker models.
is_system_vision_model = models.BooleanField(
default=False,
help_text="Mark as the system-wide vision model for image analysis."
)
@classmethod
def get_system_vision_model(cls):
return cls.objects.filter(
is_system_vision_model=True,
is_active=True,
model_type__in=["vision", "chat"], # Vision-capable chat models work
).first()
Added "vision_analysis" to LLMUsage.purpose choices for cost tracking.
2. Image Model Enhancements (library/models.py)
New fields on the Image node:
| Field | Type | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
ocr_text |
StringProperty | Visible text extracted by vision model |
vision_model_name |
StringProperty | Which model analyzed this image |
analysis_status |
StringProperty | pending / completed / failed / skipped |
Expanded image_type choices: cover, diagram, chart, table, screenshot, illustration, map, portrait, artwork, still, photo.
New relationship: Image ─[DEPICTS]─→ Concept
3. Content-Type Vision Prompts (library/content_types.py)
Each library type now includes a vision_prompt that shapes what the vision model looks for:
| Library Type | Vision Focus |
|---|---|
| Fiction | Illustrations, cover art, characters, scenes, artistic style |
| Non-Fiction | Photographs, maps, charts, people, places, historical context |
| Technical | Diagrams, schematics, charts, tables, labels, processes |
| Music | Album covers, band photos, liner notes, era/aesthetic |
| Film | Stills, posters, storyboards, cinematographic elements |
| Art | Medium, style, subject, composition, artistic period |
| Journal | Photos, sketches, documents, dates, context clues |
4. Vision Analysis Service (library/services/vision.py)
New service: VisionAnalyzer — analyzes images via the system vision model.
API Call Format
Uses OpenAI-compatible multimodal chat format:
{
"model": "qwen3-vl-72b",
"messages": [
{"role": "system", "content": "<structured JSON output instructions>"},
{"role": "user", "content": [
{"type": "text", "text": "<content-type-aware vision prompt>"},
{"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": "data:image/png;base64,..."}}
]}
],
"temperature": 0.1,
"max_tokens": 800
}
Response Structure
The vision model returns structured JSON:
{
"image_type": "diagram",
"description": "A wiring diagram showing a 3-phase motor connection with L1, L2, L3 inputs",
"ocr_text": "L1 L2 L3 GND PE 400V",
"concepts": [
{"name": "3-phase motor", "type": "topic"},
{"name": "wiring diagram", "type": "technique"}
]
}
Processing Flow
For each image:
- Read image bytes from S3
- Base64-encode and send to vision model with content-type-aware prompt
- Parse structured JSON response
- Validate and normalize (image_type must be valid, concepts capped at 20)
- Update Image node (description, ocr_text, image_type, vision_model_name, analysis_status)
- Create/connect Concept nodes via DEPICTS relationship
- Also connect Item → Concept via REFERENCES (weight 0.8)
- Log usage to LLMUsage
5. Pipeline Integration (library/services/pipeline.py)
Vision analysis is Stage 5.5 in the pipeline:
Stage 5: Store images in S3 + Neo4j (existing)
Stage 5.5: Vision analysis (NEW)
Stage 6: Embed images multimodally (existing)
Stage 7: Concept extraction from text (existing)
Behavior:
- If system vision model configured → analyze all images
- If no vision model → mark images as
analysis_status="skipped", continue pipeline - Vision analysis failures are per-image (don't fail the whole pipeline)
6. Non-Fiction Library Type
New "nonfiction" library type added alongside the existing six types:
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Strategy | section_aware |
| Chunk Size | 768 |
| Chunk Overlap | 96 |
| Boundaries | chapter, section, paragraph |
| Focus | Factual claims, historical events, people, places, arguments, evidence |
7. Prometheus Metrics (library/metrics.py)
| Metric | Type | Labels | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
mnemosyne_vision_analyses_total |
Counter | status | Images analyzed |
mnemosyne_vision_analysis_duration_seconds |
Histogram | — | Per-image analysis latency |
mnemosyne_vision_concepts_extracted_total |
Counter | concept_type | Concepts from images |
8. Dashboard & UI Updates
- Embedding dashboard shows system vision model status alongside embedding, chat, and reranker models
- Item detail page shows enriched image cards with:
- Auto-classified image type badge
- Vision-generated description
- Collapsible OCR text section
- Analysis status indicator
- Vision model name reference
File Structure
mnemosyne/library/
├── services/
│ ├── vision.py # NEW — VisionAnalyzer service
│ ├── pipeline.py # Modified — Stage 5.5 integration
│ └── ...
├── models.py # Modified — Image fields, DEPICTS rel, nonfiction type
├── content_types.py # Modified — vision_prompt for all 7 types
├── metrics.py # Modified — vision analysis metrics
├── views.py # Modified — vision model in dashboard context
└── templates/library/
├── item_detail.html # Modified — enriched image display
└── embedding_dashboard.html # Modified — vision model row
mnemosyne/llm_manager/
├── models.py # Modified — is_system_vision_model, get_system_vision_model()
└── migrations/
└── 0003_add_vision_model_and_usage.py # NEW
Performance Considerations
- Each image = one vision model inference (~2-5 seconds on local GPU)
- A document with 20 images = ~40-100 seconds of extra processing
- Runs in Celery async tasks — does not block web requests
- Uses the same GPU infrastructure already serving embedding and reranking
- Zero API cost when running locally
- Per-image failure isolation — one bad image doesn't fail the pipeline
Success Criteria
- System vision model configurable via Django admin (same pattern as other system models)
- Images auto-classified with correct image_type (not hardcoded "diagram")
- Vision-generated descriptions visible on item detail page
- OCR text extracted from images with visible text
- Concepts extracted from images connected to Concept nodes via DEPICTS
- Shared concepts bridge text chunks and images in the graph
- Pipeline gracefully skips vision analysis when no vision model configured
- Non-fiction library type available for history, biography, essays, etc.
- Prometheus metrics track vision analysis throughput and latency
- Dashboard shows vision model status