Workspace scoping is the integration's security-critical property: an agent in workspace A must never see content from workspace B or from any global library, regardless of what the calling LLM tries. Adds `workspace_id` to SearchRequest with __post_init__ normalization that converts empty strings to None — so "" cannot slip through as a truthy filter at the Cypher boundary. Extracts the workspace scope clause to a single string and appends it to all five search queries (vector, fulltext-chunk, fulltext-concept, graph, image): ($workspace_id IS NULL AND lib.workspace_id IS NULL OR lib.workspace_id = $workspace_id) Either workspace-only or global-only — never both — and the operator precedence is bracketed so a refactor can't accidentally widen it. A test verifies the literal clause string for that exact reason. Adds `workspace_id` as a parameter to every MCP tool (`search`, `get_chunk`, `list_libraries`, `list_collections`, `list_items`). Deliberately undocumented in tool docstrings so the calling LLM is never told the parameter exists — it is system-injected by Daedalus's chat path and force-overwritten before reaching Mnemosyne. Mnemosyne also validates the value but the security guarantee is enforced upstream. Adds the `get_health` MCP tool per the Pallas health spec: returns ok / degraded / error after probing Neo4j, S3, and the embedding model registration. Used by Daedalus's existing health poller. Updates the server INSTRUCTIONS string to advertise the new tool and the two new library types (business, finance). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Mnemosyne
"The electric light did not come from the continuous improvement of candles." — Oren Harari
The memory of everything you know.
Mnemosyne is a content-type-aware, multimodal personal knowledge management system built on Neo4j knowledge graphs and Qwen3-VL multimodal AI models. Named after the Titan goddess of memory and mother of the nine Muses, Mnemosyne doesn't just store your knowledge — it understands what kind of knowledge it is, connects it through relationships, and makes it all searchable through text, images, and natural language.
What Makes This Different
Every existing knowledge base tool treats all documents identically: text in, chunks out, vectors stored. A novel and a PostgreSQL manual get the same treatment.
Mnemosyne knows the difference:
- A textbook has chapters, an index, technical terminology, and pedagogical structure. It's chunked accordingly, and when an LLM retrieves results, it knows this is instructional content.
- A novel has narrative flow, characters, plot arcs, dialogue. The LLM knows to interpret results as creative fiction.
- Album artwork is a visual asset tied to an artist, genre, and era. It's embedded multimodally — searchable by both image similarity and text description.
- A journal entry is personal, temporal, reflective. The LLM treats it differently than a reference manual.
This content-type awareness flows through every layer: chunking strategy, embedding instructions, re-ranking, and the final LLM prompt.
Core Architecture
| Component | Technology | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge Graph | Neo4j 5.x | Relationships + vector storage (no dimension limits) |
| Multimodal Embeddings | Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B | Text + image + video in unified vector space (4096d) |
| Multimodal Re-ranking | Synesis (Qwen3-VL-Reranker-2B) | Cross-attention precision scoring via /v1/rerank |
| Web Framework | Django 5.x + DRF | Auth, admin, API, content management |
| Object Storage | S3/MinIO | Original content + chunk text storage |
| Async Processing | Celery + RabbitMQ | Document embedding, graph construction |
| LLM Interface | MCP Server | Primary interface for Claude, Copilot, etc. |
| GPU Serving | vLLM + llama.cpp | Local model inference |
Library Types
| Library | Example Content | Multimodal? | Graph Relationships |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiction | Novels, short stories | Cover art | Author → Book → Character → Theme |
| Technical | Textbooks, manuals, docs | Diagrams, screenshots | Product → Manual → Section → Procedure |
| Music | Lyrics, liner notes | Album artwork | Artist → Album → Track → Genre |
| Film | Scripts, synopses | Stills, posters | Director → Film → Scene → Actor |
| Art | Descriptions, catalogs | The artwork itself | Artist → Piece → Style → Movement |
| Journals | Personal entries | Photos | Date → Entry → Topic → Person/Place |
Search Pipeline
Query → Vector Search (Neo4j) + Graph Traversal (Cypher) + Full-Text Search
→ Candidate Fusion → Qwen3-VL Re-ranking → Ranked Chunks + Metadata
→ MCP tool result (the calling LLM does its own synthesis)
Heritage
Mnemosyne's RAG pipeline architecture is inspired by Spelunker, an enterprise RFP response platform. The proven patterns — hybrid search, two-stage RAG (responder + reviewer), citation-based retrieval, and async document processing — are carried forward and enhanced with multimodal capabilities and knowledge graph relationships.
Running Celery Workers
Mnemosyne uses Celery with RabbitMQ for async document embedding. From the mnemosyne/ directory:
# Development — single worker, all queues
celery -A mnemosyne worker -l info -Q celery,embedding,batch
# Or skip workers entirely with eager mode (.env):
CELERY_TASK_ALWAYS_EAGER=True
Production — separate workers:
celery -A mnemosyne worker -l info -Q embedding -c 1 -n embedding@%h # GPU-bound embedding
celery -A mnemosyne worker -l info -Q batch -c 2 -n batch@%h # Batch orchestration
celery -A mnemosyne worker -l info -Q celery -c 2 -n default@%h # LLM API validation
Scheduler & Monitoring:
celery -A mnemosyne beat -l info # Periodic task scheduler
celery -A mnemosyne flower --port=5555 # Web monitoring UI
See Phase 2: Celery Workers & Scheduler for full details on queues, reliability settings, and task progress tracking.
Architecture Note: Retrieval, Not Synthesis
Mnemosyne is a retrieval engine, not a RAG pipeline. It stores, embeds, and ranks — it does not synthesize answers.
The earlier roadmap had a server-side RAG layer that took a query and returned a written answer with citations. That layer has been removed. Calling LLMs (Claude via MCP, principally) are perfectly capable of driving iterative retrieval themselves when given the right primitives, and a server-side synthesis hop adds latency, cost, and a place where errors are harder to debug. Letting the calling LLM see chunks directly — and follow citations, pivot mid-search, or call get_chunk for full text — beats pre-digesting them.
If a "knowledge subagent" is ever wanted (a wrapper that takes a question and returns a written answer), it lives outside Mnemosyne as a thin client over the MCP tools, with its own system prompt. No coupling, no extra inference hop inside the server, and the subagent's behavior can iterate independently.
Documentation
- Architecture Documentation — Full system architecture with diagrams
- Phase 1: Foundation — Project skeleton, Neo4j data model, content-type system
- Phase 2: Embedding Pipeline — Qwen3-VL multimodal embedding
- Phase 3: Search & Re-ranking — Hybrid search + re-ranker
- Phase 5: MCP Server — Retrieval primitives for LLMs (
search,get_chunk,list_libraries, …) - Phase 6: Backport to Spelunker — Proven patterns flowing back