Compare commits

..

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
3eadbb01a2 Merge pull request 'Add reusable Heluca Google Play publishing guide' (#2) from docs-play-publishing into main
All checks were successful
build-android-builder-image / build-image (push) Successful in 1m46s
Reviewed-on: #2
2026-07-21 17:56:01 +00:00
8a05323905 docs: add reusable Heluca Google Play publishing guide
Playbook for taking any Heluca app from repo to Google Play, learned from
shipping Dade to internal testing: one-time publisher account + upload keystore
setup, per-app checklist (signing via -Pandroid.injected.signing.*, AAB,
versionCode encoding, native symbols), internal-testing flow, gotchas, and
production promotion. Bakes in Heluca conventions and documents where Dade
deliberately diverges (custom signingConfig, UPLOAD_* secret names, :latest pin)
so the next app can follow the template instead.

Link it from the README.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-21 13:52:15 -04:00
2 changed files with 244 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -8,6 +8,10 @@ tests are **not** part of this toolchain — by design, CI builds are promotions
of code already tested in Dev (on Apple silicon, where the emulator runs
natively).
**Publishing to Google Play?** See [`docs/google-play-publishing.md`](docs/google-play-publishing.md)
— the reusable Heluca playbook (publisher setup, upload keystore, per-app
checklist, internal testing, promotion to production), learned from shipping Dade.
**Why amd64:** Google publishes the Linux Android build-tools (`aapt2`, `d8`,
…) for **x86_64 only** — there is no arm64 Linux build-tools package. Running
the toolchain on an aarch64 runner fails at resource packaging

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
# Publishing a Heluca Android app to Google Play
The reusable playbook for taking a Heluca app from repo to Google Play, learned
from shipping **Dade** (`r/dade`) to internal testing. It covers the whole
lifecycle: the one-time publisher setup, the per-app checklist, and promotion to
production — with Heluca's conventions (this `r/android` toolchain, Gitea CI,
Play App Signing) baked in.
Authority order for anything ambiguous: **live app config > this guide > memory**.
When an app diverges from the convention here, that's allowed — but note it in the
app's own README so the next person knows it's deliberate. Dade's divergences are
called out throughout (see *Where Dade diverges*).
---
## 0. Concepts you need once
- **Two keys, one you hold.** Under **Play App Signing** (use it — it's the
default and lets Google reset a lost upload key), you generate an **upload key**
and sign your bundle with it; Google re-signs with the **app signing key** it
holds. You never see the app key.
- **The upload key is publisher-wide, not per-app.** One keystore signs every
Heluca app — Play keys an app by `applicationId`, not by signing key. Generate it
once (below), reuse it forever. Don't mint a new one per app.
- **Play wants an `.aab`, not an APK.** App Bundles only. That means
`bundleRelease` (or a flavored `bundle<Flavor>Release`), never `assembleRelease`,
for anything going to Play. (`assembleRelease` APKs remain useful for direct
`adb install` sideloading — Dade keeps a separate workflow for exactly that.)
- **`versionCode` is a bare integer Play compares; `versionName` is the human
label.** Every upload needs a strictly-greater `versionCode`. Heluca convention:
**encode the semver** as `MAJOR*10000 + MINOR*100 + PATCH` so the two track each
other (`0.0.1``1`, `1.2.3``10203`). Bump both together per release.
- **One listing per `applicationId`.** If an app ships per-environment flavors with
distinct ids (Dade: `ca.helu.daedalus` prod, `ca.helu.daedalus.dev` dev), each is
a **separate Play app** with its own listing, track, and opt-in link.
---
## 1. Publisher account — one-time for all of Heluca
Done once; every future app reuses it.
1. **Register** at https://play.google.com/console with a long-lived Google
account (not a throwaway). **$25 one-time** fee.
2. **Account type:** Personal is adequate — internal testing isn't gated either
way. Organization needs a D-U-N-S number and unlocks skipping the
new-personal-account production testing gate; only worth it if you'll push to
production broadly.
3. **Identity verification** (2026 rules): government ID, possibly a selfie and an
address document. Can take a few hours to a couple of days.
4. **Device verification** (personal accounts): install the **Play Console** app
on a real Android phone and confirm it before you can publish.
## 2. Generate the upload keystore — one-time for all of Heluca
Lives in `~/.android` (alongside the Android debug keystore) — out of your home
root, easy to include in backups. **Back it up and store the password in your
vault.** JDK 17+ `keytool` prompts for a single password and reuses it for both
the store and the key, so the two password secrets later hold the same value.
```bash
keytool -genkeypair -v -keystore ~/.android/heluca-upload.jks -alias heluca-upload \
-keyalg RSA -keysize 4096 -validity 10000 \
-dname "CN=Heluca, O=helu.ca, C=CA"
```
`-dname` is cosmetic under Play App Signing (Google re-signs), so `CN=Heluca` is
fine and consistent across apps.
Encode it once for CI secrets:
```bash
base64 -i ~/.android/heluca-upload.jks | pbcopy # macOS
# base64 -w0 ~/.android/heluca-upload.jks # Linux (one line, no wrap)
```
---
## 3. Per-app checklist — repeat for each new app
Assumes the account (§1) and upload keystore (§2) already exist.
### 3a. Gradle — signing + AAB + versionCode
The **Heluca convention** is the `r/android` template's approach: **inject signing
at job time via `-Pandroid.injected.signing.*`, no `signingConfig` in
`build.gradle.kts` at all.** This keeps the build file clean and the keystore
purely a CI concern. See `templates/build.yml` in this repo.
Set the versionCode encoding in `defaultConfig`:
```kotlin
defaultConfig {
// MAJOR*10000 + MINOR*100 + PATCH — versionName 0.0.1 -> versionCode 1
versionCode = 1
versionName = "0.0.1"
}
```
Nothing else is required for signing if you use `-Pandroid.injected.signing.*`.
### 3b. Native debug symbols (only if the app bundles `.so` libraries)
If the app ships native libraries (JNI, ONNX, a VAD lib, etc.), Play warns that
the `.aab` has no native debug symbols and native crashes show raw addresses. Fix
it in the release build type:
```kotlin
buildTypes {
release {
ndk { debugSymbolLevel = "SYMBOL_TABLE" } // function names; FULL adds line numbers
}
}
```
AGP embeds the symbols in the `.aab`; Play consumes them on upload. Use
`SYMBOL_TABLE` for prebuilt deps you don't build from source; `FULL` only if you
need line numbers. Pure-Kotlin/Java apps can skip this.
### 3c. Minification & the mapping file
If `isMinifyEnabled = true`, upload the R8 mapping file so Play deobfuscates
crash traces (AGP attaches it to the bundle automatically). If minification is
**off**, Play still prints a generic "no deobfuscation file" warning — **ignore
it**, there's nothing to upload.
### 3d. CI secrets (per app repo, or org-level)
Following the `r/android` convention, add these Gitea Action Secrets to the app
repo (**Settings → Actions → Secrets**). Org-level secrets avoid re-adding them
per app.
| Secret | Value |
|--------|-------|
| `KEYSTORE_BASE64` | `base64 -w0 ~/.android/heluca-upload.jks` (the whole `.jks` as text) |
| `KEYSTORE_PASSWORD` | the keystore password |
| `KEY_ALIAS` | `heluca-upload` |
| `KEY_PASSWORD` | same as the keystore password (JDK 17 unifies them) |
| `PACKAGE_TOKEN` | PAT with `read:package` (to pull the toolchain image) |
### 3e. CI workflow
Drop `templates/build.yml` from this repo into the app at
`.gitea/workflows/build.yml`. It runs inside the pinned toolchain image, decodes
the keystore, and builds the signed artifact. For a Play app, run it with the
`bundleRelease` task (the template exposes a `workflow_dispatch` choice; flavored
apps need `bundle<Flavor>Release` — adjust the task/matrix accordingly).
**Pin the toolchain to an immutable tag** (`git.helu.ca/r/android:2026.06`), never
`:latest`, for anything whose output you'll ship. See this repo's README →
*Tagging model*.
### 3f. Create the Play app(s) & upload
Per `applicationId` (one app, or one per flavor):
1. Play Console → **Create app** → name, language, app/game, free/paid, accept
declarations.
2. Complete the **App content** declarations (privacy policy URL, data safety, ads,
content rating, target audience). Internal testing tolerates a minimal honest
pass.
3. **Testing → Internal testing → Create new release** → upload the `.aab`
(download the CI artifact; it's zipped by Gitea's transport — unzip to get the
raw `app-*-release.aab`). Enable **Play App Signing** when prompted.
4. Add release notes ("What's new," ≤500 chars — describe the app for a first-time
tester, not the CI plumbing). **Save → Review release → Start rollout.**
### 3g. Add testers & install
1. Internal testing → **Testers** tab → create an email list → add the Google
account(s) on your phones.
2. **Copy link** (the opt-in URL) → open it **on the phone**, signed into that same
account → accept → the Play listing's **Install** appears.
3. Repeat the opt-in per app (each `applicationId` has its own link). Flavored apps
install side by side.
---
## 4. Gotchas (all learned the hard way on Dade)
- **"Item isn't available" right after opting in is normal propagation lag** —
1030 min typical, up to a couple of hours on a brand-new app's first release,
even when the console says "Available to internal testers." Not a
misconfiguration. Confirm the release status, confirm the **exact tester account**
is active in the phone's Play Store, then wait.
- **"Not reviewed" / "(unreviewed)" temporary app name does NOT block internal
testing** — that track is review-exempt. It clears on its own.
- **No install notification.** Google doesn't ping you that a testing app/build
exists. First install is always via the opt-in link. Updates auto-arrive (if
auto-update is on) or via Play Store → Manage apps & device → Update — no reliable
per-app notification for testing tracks.
- **Each upload needs a higher `versionCode`** or Play rejects the duplicate. The
encoding in §0 makes this mechanical.
- **Same Google account** on the device as in the tester list, or the opt-in link
404s / "not available."
- **The AAB is already a zip; Gitea's artifact download re-zips it** — the outer
`.zip` is ~the same size because you can't re-compress compressed data. Unzip once
and upload the inner `.aab`. Harmless.
---
## 5. Promoting to production
Internal testing (≤100 testers, no review gate) is where Heluca apps live for
personal use. To go public:
1. **Closed/open testing first if required.** New *personal* accounts must run a
closed test with **≥12 testers for ≥14 days** before production unlocks.
Organization accounts skip this. Internal testing does **not** count toward it.
2. **Full store listing + all App content declarations** must be complete (they're
optional-ish for internal, mandatory for production).
3. **Production track → Create release** → promote the same `.aab` (or a newer one)
→ it goes through Google **review** (hours to days) before rollout.
4. Consider a **staged rollout** (start at a small % of users).
For a personal, off-public-store app, you may never leave internal testing — that's
a valid end state, not a stepping stone.
---
## Where Dade diverges from this convention
Dade shipped before this guide was written and differs in a few deliberate ways.
Documented here so the next app can decide to follow the template (recommended) or
knowingly match Dade.
| Aspect | Convention (this guide / `templates/build.yml`) | Dade |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|------|
| Signing injection | `-Pandroid.injected.signing.*` at job time, no `signingConfig` in Gradle | Custom `signingConfig` reading `DADE_KEYSTORE*` env vars |
| Secret names | `KEYSTORE_BASE64` / `KEYSTORE_PASSWORD` / `KEY_ALIAS` / `KEY_PASSWORD` | `UPLOAD_KEYSTORE_BASE64` / `UPLOAD_KEYSTORE_PASSWORD` / `UPLOAD_KEY_PASSWORD` |
| Toolchain pin | Immutable `:2026.06` | Moving `:latest` (README flags this to pin later) |
| Workflow | One `templates/build.yml`, task selectable | Two: `build-apks.yml` (unsigned APKs, sideload) + `build-bundles.yml` (signed AABs, Play) |
Dade's split (separate unsigned-APK and signed-AAB workflows) is worth keeping for
an app you also sideload during dev. A **new app that only targets Play** should
follow the single-template convention and standard secret names — less to maintain,
and org-level secrets work across repos when the names match.
**New app? Prefer the convention in §3.** Reach for Dade's pattern only when you
have Dade's reason (per-env flavors + a parallel sideload path).